Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?

Abhilasha Ravichander, Yonatan Belinkov, Eduard Hovy

Interpretability and Analysis of Models for NLP Long paper Paper

Zoom-8C: Apr 23, Zoom-8C: Apr 23 (12:00-13:00 UTC) [Join Zoom Meeting]
Gather-3C: Apr 23, Gather-3C: Apr 23 (13:00-15:00 UTC) [Join Gather Meeting]

You can open the pre-recorded video in separate windows.

Abstract: Although neural models have achieved impressive results on several NLP benchmarks, little is understood about the mechanisms they use to perform language tasks. Thus, much recent attention has been devoted to analyzing the sentence representations learned by neural encoders, through the lens of `probing' tasks. However, to what extent was the information encoded in sentence representations, as discovered through a probe, actually used by the model to perform its task? In this work, we examine this probing paradigm through a case study in Natural Language Inference, showing that models can learn to encode linguistic properties even if they are not needed for the task on which the model was trained. We further identify that pretrained word embeddings play a considerable role in encoding these properties rather than the training task itself, highlighting the importance of careful controls when designing probing experiments. Finally, through a set of controlled synthetic tasks, we demonstrate models can encode these properties considerably above chance-level, even when distributed in the data as random noise, calling into question the interpretation of absolute claims on probing tasks.
NOTE: Video may display a random order of authors. Correct author list is at the top of this page.

Connected Papers in EACL2021

Similar Papers