On Hallucination and Predictive Uncertainty in Conditional Language Generation

Yijun Xiao, William Yang Wang

Interpretability and Analysis of Models for NLP Long paper Paper

Gather-2C: Apr 22, Gather-2C: Apr 22 (13:00-15:00 UTC) [Join Gather Meeting]

You can open the pre-recorded video in separate windows.

Abstract: Despite improvements in performances on different natural language generation tasks, deep neural models are prone to hallucinating facts that are incorrect or nonexistent. Different hypotheses are proposed and examined separately for different tasks, but no systematic explanations are available across these tasks. In this study, we draw connections between hallucinations and predictive uncertainty in conditional language generation. We investigate their relationship in both image captioning and data-to-text generation and propose a simple extension to beam search to reduce hallucination. Our analysis shows that higher predictive uncertainty corresponds to a higher chance of hallucination. Epistemic uncertainty is more indicative of hallucination than aleatoric or total uncertainties. It helps to achieve better results of trading performance in standard metric for less hallucination with the proposed beam search variant.
NOTE: Video may display a random order of authors. Correct author list is at the top of this page.

Connected Papers in EACL2021

Similar Papers